Search for: "In re F. E." Results 4001 - 4020 of 7,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In the De La Riva case linked below, the 4th DCA provided this short summary of the law as applied to cases where you’re trying to sue an estate: “[I]t is well-settled that ‘an “[e]state” is not an entity that can be a party to litigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:41 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/403(e) In most Illinois divorce cases “the date of dissolution is the proper date for valuation of the parties’ [marital assets]. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:37 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
N/A e) Is it possible to provide any insight regarding what is seen by CBP? [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:47 am by Jeff Nowak
They’re good to go, and they almost certainly will go unchanged for another three years. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:34 pm by Nikki Siesel
If an Examiner would say yes to these two questions then the mark may be considered deceptively misdescriptive and refused under Section 2(e) of the Trademark Act. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:11 pm
The Ministry has carefully re-examined the matter in the context of the emerging trends in the economy and regulatory and accounting practices and has decided that the permission may be granted on a general basis wherever the Board of Directors of the holding company gives its consent and the conditions prescribed are complied with. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:09 am by Steve Statsinger
Rigas, 490 F.3d 208 (2d Cir. 2007). [read post]