Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 13,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Hartung In the first part of this series posted last week, I discussed the majority and concurring opinions in Athena v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:30 am
The review focuses "largely on the controversial decision issued by the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
It doesn't to me.Bottom line: Things are not going to get noticeably better on the streets of Portland for a long, long time. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:46 am
Employers can get pretty creative when it comes to discriminating against people who file discrimination charges with the EEOC. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court decision in Egbert v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:35 am
I'm holding some papers in the ABC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:26 am
The most recent appellate pronouncement on this issue is from the 7th Circuit, in Carothers v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:55 am
Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Chris Martin made the remarks in R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:21 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:12 am
The first category of cases usually gets more attention than the second, as more people are interested in the rights of flag burners than issues relating to the separation of powers. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
While plaintiff said the doctor coerced him to enter the facility, state law allows doctors to "encourage" people to do so. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:31 am
(Mel Evans/Associated Press) Last week, the 11th Circuit (Buehrle v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
And as always, please drop a line or a comment if I've missed one. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:31 am
")Overall, the language group's argument in Paramount v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
They’re part of a group of more than 500 plaintiffs who have brought various tort claims against BP in the case of Samuel Charles Boyd, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
Late last week, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Evans v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
To most people, this might seem a bit unusual but the law provides that personal acts like going to the bathroom or going to the break room are generally considered to be “in the course of" employment and are considered a normal part of expected "personal comfort" necessary for regular employment.The Appellate Court in Circuit City v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
