Search for: "M J.1." Results 4001 - 4020 of 9,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm by Douglas Marques
Além disso, quando não há expediente do fornecedor no dia final do prazo de reflexão, o direito do consumidor se prorrogará para o 1º dia útil subsequente. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:58 am by Giles Peaker
Comment I’m not wholly sure what to make of this. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:50 am by Francisco Macías
  (Id. at xi, fn. 1, citing four entries under the heading Jónsbók on the Iceland Parliament website.) [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 11:46 am
The latest issue of Europa Ethnica (2015, nos. 1/2). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 His judgment on the other bits – in particular section 6 and Article 14, Sch 1 Human Rights Act 1998 – is also almost certainly wrong imho. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm by Jeremy
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:41 am
§ 284;g) declaring the '676 patent is directly infringed by Defendant;h) declaring Defendant's infringement of the '676 patent has been willful;i) declaring Defendant be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from manufacturing, using, selling and offering to sell the infringing products in the United States prior to the expiration of the '676 patent;j) awarding damages adequate to compensate Plaintiff for Defendant's infringement of the '676 patent… [read post]