Search for: "Mark Case" Results 4001 - 4020 of 70,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  As regular readers know, I do this Case Update every Monday. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:53 am
Beyond any weather forecast, it should have been a bad day in Luxembourg for Melt Water, the Lithuanian company which lost a couple of days ago on absolute grounds both trade mark cases T-69/14and T-70/14 on appeal to the General Court.Back in 2012 Melt Water applied to register a figurative sign for 'MELT WATER Original' (depicted on the right) and a three-dimensional sign representing a bottle shape (below, left), as Community trade marks (CTMs).… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
” They argue that the history of wartime cases is one marked by executive aggrandizement, panic-driven attacks on civil liberties, and overly quiescent courts - none of which should be repeated. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
The Juzgado de lo Mercanti took the view that, in the proceedings pending before it, it would have to establish whether the exclusive right which Article 9(1) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation [which lists the infringing acts] gives a CTM (in this case FCI) the right to enforce its trade mark right against a third party which is itself the proprietor of a later registered CTM (ie FCIPPR) before its later trade mark has been declared invalid. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to a June 13, 2014 article by Zack Needles in The Legal Intelligencer entitled "Judge OKs Punitives Claim for Cellphone Use in  Crash Case," Judge Mark I. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:15 am by One LLP
(RCI) owned a valid federal trademark in the mark “AGRINET”, a play on the words Agricultural and Network. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 8:44 am by Brian Leiter
(This study finds a marked increase begins at age 50, although the highest fatality rates are for those over age 80.) [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:35 am by admin
The decision marks the first time that an appellate court has answered a question left undecided by the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Regarding the other marks cited, the Board ruled out any likelihood of confusion because of their even less marked similarity to the mark for which the application is contested [recent case on likelihood of confusion here]. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:53 am
This decision marks the first of its kind pertaining to a personal injury claim brought in Florida against the cruise line. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As IPBiz has previously noted, advertising for Gerald Posner's book "Case Closed" on the Kennedy assassination produced various Lanham Act cases for false advertising. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:13 am by Jani Ihalainen
After discussing the Louboutin shoe sole case some time ago, one envisioned the matter going ahead to the CJEU without a hitch. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:16 pm by Locke Lord's AdMark Services
José Cuervo case, aesthetic functionality is front-and-center once again, with Cuervo claiming that the “hand-dipped wax seal” look helps create an artisanal image that helped to sell its luxury tequila at $100 per bottle. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:09 am by Brian Galbraith
The divorce proceedings were marked by allegations of domestic violence, financial disputes, and a battle over the division of assets. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
In my case note on Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 303 (29 March 2011) of 2 April 2011 in this blog and in my note on Schutz (UK) Ltd and Another v Delta Containers Ltd and Another [2011] EWHC 1173 (Pat) (5 May 2011) in IP North West I referred to the practice of cross-bottling. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:48 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern (Lubberger Lehment )
Higher Court of Düsseldorf – “Birenstock” The Regional Court of Hamburg’s stance regarding Art. 15 subsection 1 EUTMR contradicts the one taken by the Higher Court of Düsseldorf in a similar case in 2019 (24.01.2019 – 20 U 53/18). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm by Nikki Siesel
Since the issue of likelihood of confusion was determined, the case turned into a question of priority. [read post]