Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 4001 - 4020 of 123,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
As the court noted, under Illinois law "'failure to present expert testimony is usually fatal to a plaintiff's legal malpractice claim.'" Barth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:23 pm by jewatson
As part of a campus wide United Way campaign, OCU students, faculty, and staff donated money to have their favorite OCU personalities hit in the face with a pie. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 8:26 am
  In denying the employee’s motion for a protective order, the court in Scott v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:56 am by Marty Schwimmer
The 2d Cir finds the totality of those sales sufficient for personal jurisdiction Page 18: the court says that a single trap sale 'might well be sufficent.' Decision Chloe Queen Bee 2d Circuit PJ [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:17 am by Paul Dietze Ph.D.
(“Mylan”), a generic drug manufacturer, was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in Delaware because Mylan had filed an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) and “contemplate[d] plans to engage in marketing of the proposed generic drugs” in the state.[1] The ruling affirmed two different decisions by judges in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that Mylan was subject to specific jurisdiction in... [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:49 am
In the case of Kylie Palmer v Estate of Kevin Palmer (deceased) and others [2008] EWCA Civ 46, the Court of Appeal has refused to overturn a decision forcing Royal Sun Alliance (RSA) to pay the opposing parties' costs personally. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:45 am by alysondrake
  Sarah Weddington was the youngest person to argue successfully in front of the Supreme Court, in Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
In an important decision that will have profound implications for media reporting as well as for individuals subject to criminal investigation, the Supreme Court has today held that, as a legitimate starting point, a person under criminal investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation (ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5). [read post]