Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade; State’s law banning procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy presents direct challenge to 1973 precedent. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am
Anderson: States cannot disqualify candidates for federal offices from the ballot under Section 3. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
ThermoLife International LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:16 am
Hyperheal sued, asserting various state law and trademark claims. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:03 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
in the case of Bywater v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Writing in Slate, Mark Joseph Stern suggests that state supreme courts, relying on state constitutions, could be a site of liberal decision making. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Keegan.This case was prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Sociologist and expert on the states Mark Regnerus tried to revive this theory in recent years, particularly in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am
This year marks the fifth legislative session in which Texas lawmakers have failed to pass legislation to establish procedures to memorialize Atkins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mark J.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:20 am
Minnesota is in the Eighth Circuit, and courts here are guided by the SquirtCo factors (named for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals’ 1980 ruling in SquirtCo v Seven-Up Co.). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
The last date, of course, marks the night on which the jury in Florida v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
In The Law Society v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
