Search for: "U.S. v. Roa*" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The cases involved a man and a woman who had been dismissed by the Royal Air Force and 2 men who had been dismissed by the Royal Navy  for being homosexual (see, respectively, Smith And Grady v United Kingdom and Lustig-Prean and Beckett v UK; also, the 2002 case of Beck, Copp and Bazeley v UK). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by William A. Ruskin
” He determined that plaintiff’s submission concerning medical causation failed to meet the test under Frye v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Would a normal defendant refrain from relying on a jurisdictional defence - such as being dragged into the wrong court or a limitation period – in order to take the high road and have a civilized debate on the merits? [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Would a normal defendant refrain from relying on a jurisdictional defence - such as being dragged into the wrong court or a limitation period – in order to take the high road and have a civilized debate on the merits? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Under well-established principles underlying the U.S. judicial system, by analogy, a motion to dismiss should address only questions of law, not questions of fact—in this case, the question of whether the actions the president is alleged to have committed rise to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
As anyone familiar with the actual law in Davis v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 8:14 am by Leland Garvin
In a recent study published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, it was noted that more than 18,000 golf cart-related injuries are reported in the U.S. every year. [read post]