Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 4001 - 4020 of 23,686
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2020, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
When they did not succeed, they filed suit in the United States District Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Kirstjanson grounded her decision in international legal principles such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada in A.C. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Thomas Key
A Kat sees her own reflectionA potential circuit split in U.S. copyright law exists over the volitional act requirement for copyright infringement liability (see Katpost by Ieva Gierdrimaite addressing VHT v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
According to her emails, Smocovitis reported back to Proctor that her departmental colleagues were indifferent or annoyed or both for her having bothered them with Proctor’s issue. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
According to her emails, Smocovitis reported back to Proctor that her departmental colleagues were indifferent or annoyed or both for her having bothered them with Proctor’s issue. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:19 pm by Russell Knight
Most jurisdictions in the United States have the concept of “waiving service. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:26 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Fostoria Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm by Giles Peaker
Mrs Nur does not work because of her caring responsibilities for Z and is therefore in receipt of state welfare benefits. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
Further, following Lady Hale and Lord Kerr’s judgments in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Article 3(1) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child 1959 should be applied such that a primacy of importance must be given to the best interests of a child. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am by Michael Neuner
However, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a Jones Act seaman’s claims for negligence and unseaworthiness, confirming that the seaman’s burden is not weightless. [read post]