Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 4001 - 4020 of 22,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton, 59 F.3d 1058, 1073 (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute); People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
In response to these requests for presidential records, Trump declared that “[e]xecutive privilege will be defended, not just on behalf of my Administration and the Patriots who worked beside me, but on behalf of the Office of the President of the United States and the future of our Nation. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm by Patricia Hughes
When people are dismissive of these claims, others immediately respond, “But what about Amselem? [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
Who’s Covered by the Bill The bill defines “electronic commerce platform” as “any electronically accessed platform that includes publicly interactive features that allow for arranging the sale or purchase of goods, or that enables a person other than an operator of the platform to sell or offer to sell physical goods to consumers located in the United States. [read post]
The right of abortion is one of the most contentious political and legal issues in the United States today. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:26 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Sherkow, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette, Nicholson Price, and Rachel SachsHistorically, the United States’ preparedness for a pandemic is like Charles Dudley Warner’s aphorism on the weather: everybody talks about it but no one ever does anything. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Jasmine Wang
Earlier this month, Texas enacted the strictest abortion restrictions the United States has seen since before the U.S. [read post]
The WHPA makes explicit that access to abortion services is essential to health care and the ability of people to “participate equally in the economic and social life in the United Sates. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
  Indeed, this is in some respects, part of the same family of critiques of the placement of CSR or RBC units within a complex multinational economic organization. [read post]