Search for: "V. JACKSON" Results 4001 - 4020 of 9,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
’ In Pirtek (UK) v Jackson [2017] EWHC 2834, on a judgment in default application where the defendant was not represented and hence did not put forward any arguments, Warby J said at [44] of the third and least serious meaning complained of: “Tax avoidance” refers to a lawful activity, distinct from tax evasion which is unlawful. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Senate candidate Roy Moore speaks at a revival on Tuesday in Jackson, Ala. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Assessment in such cases should be carried out under the old CPR 44.4(2) On the same day Warby J heard an application for default judgment in the case of Pirtek (UK) Ltd v Jackson. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Jackson Free Press, Arielle Dreher reports that “[t]he nine U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The section does not apply to any claims where jurisdiction has been taken under the Regulation or the Lugano Convention, as in those cases the defendant can be sued “as of right” – wherever the claimant is situated – under the rule in C-281/02 Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At this blog, Andrew Hamm covers a Supreme Court Historical Society event examining the life and legacy of Justice Robert Jackson. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
During a poker game, Roosevelt asked Jackson how he had voted in Southern Steamship Company v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:41 am by Native American Rights Fund
Jackson (Employment - Wrongful Termination; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlBrown v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:41 am by Native American Rights Fund
Jackson (Employment - Wrongful Termination; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.htmlBrown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 * See McKee v Jackson, 152 AD2d 54, holding that a probationer is entitled to a minimum period of time to demonstrate his or her ability to successfully perform the duties of the position, and Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904, holding that a probationer may be dismissed without notice and hearing after completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to the expiration of his or her maximum period of probation. [read post]