Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 8,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 10:38 am
On February 12, 2015, the Florida Supreme Court quashed the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Sanders v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Articles about the First Amendment, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law rules, and regulations protecting or restricting speech, or private organizations' speech regulations. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:01 pm
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued a decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
State just got mobbed. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
Krug promptly searched the phone pursuant to the warrant and found numerous sexually explicit images of young girls.U.S. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am
In the Courts Australia Massoud v Ors [2021] NSWDC 336, District Court of New South Wales, the plaintiff was suspended and dismissed from his employment as a journalist for telling an 18 year old cadet that if he weren’t so young, the plaintiff would “rip his head off and shit down his throat. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 15, 2008 Young v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
Young v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
By contrast, both OHIM bodies and GC have a duty to conduct a full review of the national law particulars submitted by parties, obtaining information about the national law of the Member State concerned on their own motion for the purposes of assessing the accuracy of the facts adduced or the probative value of the documents submitted [Edwin v OHIM, Case C‑263/09 P], as the GC did by looking through Italian law and case law on probative value of the 1986… [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
And indeed, in this context (unlike that of a crucial eyewitness) the state can protect itself to a great degree by ensuring (as is standard practice in at least some jurisdictions) that at least two people competent to testify about what happened in the autopsy are present (and preferably one of them rather young!). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:51 am
In today's case, Murray v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Can you describe the differences between statutory law systems in the United States and the statutory codes of European states? [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:58 am
Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 906 A.2d 168 (Del. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 11:21 am
Netflix * UC Irvine Virtual World Conference Notes * Facebook User Loses Lawsuit Over Account Termination–Young v. [read post]
