Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 6,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 10:43 am
” Breyer notes that Justice Antonin Scalia has filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
” When Elwood suggested that Congress had “to have some sort of” referent, Justice Antonin Scalia suggested that “pending” is “a very strange word to pick” and suggested that “former” would have made a lot more sense. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am
The most unexpected turn, however, comes from Justice Antonin Scalia and his comments on race. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 5:10 pm
Eight years ago, Breyer and Justice Antonin Scalia engaged in a mini-debate over Faretta’s “continuing constitutional validity” (Breyer’s phrase) in separate opinions in Martinez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” At NPR, Nina Totenberg considers a lesser-known legacy of the late Justice Antonin Scalia: his speeches, the most notable of which are included in a new anthology, “Scalia Speaks,” edited by Scalia’s son Christopher Scalia and conservative commentator Edward Whelan. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm
Trump nominated Eugene Scalia—son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP—to be the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
” Justice Antonin Scalia, in contrast, seemed to agree with Fisher, stating that he didn’t see any way to read the statute other than that “when [the city] denies, it has to have a reason for denying. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:44 am
The discourse started with a question by Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion for the unanimous Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:24 am
And Preis told Justice Antonin Scalia, in reply to a question about what a lawyer should tell a client asking about a state remedy, that the reply should be: “I can’t be certain.” Perhaps Preis’s best moment came when he answered a question from Justice Kagan about why Pollard had not, in fact, filed a claim under state law. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:07 pm
” Justice Antonin Scalia quickly interrupted her, telling her that, “Before you go further,” he was having some problems squaring the city’s merits brief with what the Court thought it had agreed to hear in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Gay RightsIn one of the most controversial dissents of the last fifty years, Justice Antonin Scalia said the following about a Texas statute that criminalized consensual, private gay sodomy: “The Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are ‘immoral and unacceptable…’ the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy,… [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:21 am
But Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the dissenters, said the Court had validated the use of scientific evidence taken without a warrant not to make an identification but to gather evidence to solve cold cases — something he said the Court has never allowed before. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
But the entire tone and content of the Perry argument suggested that something more basic was going on — a casting aside of the Due Process Clause as a barrier to unreliable criminal evidence, a project that Justice Antonin Scalia seemed eager to lead. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 11:21 am
Scalia, of course, cares about institutional legitimacy. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
Justice Scalia stayed that ruling last September. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy) noted in Lehnert v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg all seemed like solid votes for the federal government, defending the subsidies, while the challengers could clearly count on the votes of Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:43 am
First, the Court is not going to follow Justice Antonin Scalia’s lead and remove all constitutional restraints on such demands. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
In Crawford, Justice Antonin Scalia had written a unanimous decision in favor of a defendant convicted after a trial in which prosecutors played a prerecorded statement by a witness who did not appear for cross-examination. [read post]
