Search for: "Cash v. Cash" Results 4021 - 4040 of 8,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2014, 11:27 am by Ann Caresani
By Ann Caresani As a follow up to our blog on the ERISA sponsor / fiduciary boundary dispute, here is another case, Coulter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Each stock purchase was governed by a stock restriction agreement providing that the company had the “right to call any of the Shares for repurchase, in exchange for payment in cash of the most recent value of the Shares . . . at any time following the Purchaser’s disability, death, or termination of, or retirement from, the Company’s employment. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 27 – 28 November 2013. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:08 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In the closing days of its May term, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court held that the answer was “yes,” rejecting the licensee’s due process challenge to revocation in WISAM 1, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc & Ors) v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 27 – 28 November 2013. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
Somehow, the courts have gotten far enough away from this basic proposition that now copyright owners have plenty of leverage over user-generated content websites without ever sending them takedown notices at all; and in light of BS rulings like Garcia v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
We’ve frequently discussed the controversial case of Fifeld v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
The stations included preparing ice cream treats, working the cash register, maintaining the dining area, and more. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:43 am by David DePaolo
Most state systems allow settlement of claims via some full release mechanism.In 2011 reform legislation allowed injured workers 55 and older to enter structured settlements, which the Department of Labor & Industries through its Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals would oversee to make sure that such settlements were adequate.Next year the age limitation decreases to 50.The Washington State FlagEarlier this month the Washington state Court of Appeals ruled in BIIA v. [read post]