Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 5,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
Banker, July 10, 2007, at 1). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
Banker, July 10, 2007, at 1). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
By requiring all parties to complete their relevant submissions during opposition proceedings, the moment in time when the parties’ case has to be complete is not determined by the procedural strategy chosen by the parties. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
See #1. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
" All parties in this case acknowledged the "face value" of the counterfeit items to be $400, the four $100 bills used for demonstration purposes. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:06 am
If the answer is yes, then the payment does not constitute a contribution. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
The FEC regulation interpreting the personal use prohibition includes the following: (6) Third party payments. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
No one would’ve thought 100 years ago that a Betty Boop T-shirt implicated brand value. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
In sentencing the defendant to a 5-year mandatory minimum sentence for a crack sale, the district court railed against the law, bemoaned the injustice of the sentence, and decried the impact on African Americans of the crack 100:1 ratio. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:40 pm
Question - can we sue an association that does not have FHA Approval. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
According to A 100 b) an opposition may be filed on the ground that a European patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:19 pm
Bishop Iker's office has released the following statement about their action:Statement of Jurisdictionasks state Supreme Courtto hear appealOn Wednesday, June 1, attorneys for the Diocese initiated our direct appeal to the Texas State Supreme Court, arguing that the high court should review the trial court's Feb. 8 judgment in favor of local Episcopal Church (TEC) parties without the delay of an intermediate appeal.The Statement of Jurisdiction asks for the Supreme… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:13 am
Question – can we sue an association that does not have FHA Approval. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:50 am
Third party organizations, including political parties, now have 48 hours to turn in voter registration cards or face a $50 fine per application (or $100 if received after the book closing deadline and $500 if not submitted at all). [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The [patent proprietor] appears to deduce from this provision that, in the absence of a request by the [opponent] to continue the proceedings, the board may terminate the appeal proceedings in the present case.[1.3] In the case law of the boards of appeal, R 84(1) and its predecessor R 60(1) EPC 1973 have been applied per analogiam in appeal opposition proceedings (see R 100(1) and R 66(1) EPC 1973) when the opponent was the sole [opponent]. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Because the shareholders will get cash for a portion of their shares, VC Parsons concluded that the transaction was subjected to the heightened Revlon standard of review rather than the business judgment rule: ... while no Smurfit-Stone stockholder will be cashed out 100%, 100% of its stockholders who elect to participate in the merger will see approximately 50% of their Smurfit-Stone investment cashed out. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
Does the PIP Statute Seek to Prevent Providers From Asking for Too Much? [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:55 am
People often ask me what is estate planning and what does the process entail? [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
(Chicago IP Litigation) (IP Spotlight) What does the Therasense decision mean for patent reexamination? [read post]
