Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 4021 - 4040 of 8,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2016, 3:54 pm by Zosha Millman
FTC Says Listen Up When Vulnerability Reports Come In – Washington, D.C. attorneys Paul Otto and W. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s where we are today w/a huge problem facing the media. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Washington’s philosophy of accommodation to the status quo in racial matters. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the nonmoving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Heirs that agreed to do something = doesn’t matter given the statutory language. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:33 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Efferent reading should be the task for matters of law. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two aspects: (1) “matter of concern” in normal and intended use; (2) if you can’t see it we don’t care. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The appearance of the drug doesn’t matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Began w/Ken Port’s Mitchell Study on TM Litigation—2972 cases; adding stock prices to it; pulling out cases w/o a publicly traded party. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
[W]e believe that the holding in Pennsylvania Firecannot be divorced from the outdated jurisprudential assumptions of its era. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Traditional analysis: just redistribution, no welfare effects; maybe it’s in pockets of Congress, but that doesn’t matter. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
  The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment arguing, as a matter of law, that neither of these actions constituted unlawful off-label promotion and the Court agreed. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:39 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – DEPENDENT NEGLECT DA 15-0491, 2016 MT 40N, IN THE MATTER OF: M.A.W., M.L.W., and K.R.T., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that “[w]here an employer conducts a GPS search without making a reasonable effort to avoid tracking an employee outside of business hours, the search as a whole must be considered unreasonable. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:45 am by Elina Saxena
You know, the fact of the matter is the world is desperate for our leadership. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell
We doubt this particular defense would have legs—either as a matter of law or as a matter of fact before any jury—after such factual development. [read post]