Search for: "John Doe 4 " Results 4021 - 4040 of 7,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2021, 10:58 am by Scott Bomboy
Frederick (2007), a divided Supreme Court said school officials could restrict student free speech if it was seen reasonably as promoting illegal drug use, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for a 5-4 majority. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:37 pm by Race to the Bottom
Id.Wells Fargo has certainly taken a hit since the asset cap was imposed; almost $4 billion in profits, by one estimate. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
The 5-4 ruling, with Justice John Paul Stevens writing for the majority, was announced in his absence by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
But as the judge noted, this “does not mean it was not received…It could have simply been misplaced after receipt…. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 2:28 pm by Ambassador Daniel Fried
RFE/RL’s history suggests that the effectiveness of such broadcasting does not take place in linear fashion: it doesn’t bring about change…until it does. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
***A comment by LBE to the Stanford Daily on Feb. 10, 2011 was not publishedAlthough the Stanford Daily did not publish a comment by LBE on the above article (LBE is a Stanford alum), LBE/IPBiz dopublish a comment by Alan Regenberg of the Hinxton group.Alan does have a New Jersey connection [Alan completed his undergraduate training in History and Psychology at Rutgers University, and received his Master of Bioethics degree from the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. ]… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
It was also the last time retiring Justice John Paul Stevens would hear arguments with his fellow justices, after 34 years on the high court.Marcia Coyle of "The National Law Journal" was there, and she joins us now.And, Marcia, what was at issue in the case of Doe vs. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
It does not follow from this that the memory that is described is itself wrong, but the recall of implausible details does raise questions about the nature and purpose of a memory so described. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
As noted in footnote 1 in 4 Chi.- Kent J. [read post]