Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 8,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am
In short, if a majority of justices have the will to invalidate the individual insurance mandate, they surely have the way. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 6:07 am
People may be living in small apartments as they reorganize their lives. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:04 pm
” Buckles v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:04 pm
” Buckles v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:48 am
., Martin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Similar to the election of 1888, the 2016 election was the second election in a short period of time—sixteen years—in which the popular vote winner did not win the Electoral College. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
forcing people into mediation when this is ? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
In Campbell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
People usually think it's a good thing to be "on a roll." [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
And an excessive royalty isn't less excessive just because some people accept it. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
(Michigan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court in Worcester v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
The Court's 2005 ruling in Kelo v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm
Some people in Cupertino should listen to the official recording (MP3) of yesterday's Federal Circuit hearing on the cross-appeal relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Representatives Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Richard Neal (D-Mass.) argued for replacing the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), an amendment to the Social Security Act that reduces payments for people whose careers involved work in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
