Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4021 - 4040 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 5:47 am by Madeleine A. Hensler
” As reported in June 2012 by Socially Aware, the PCCare247 court is not the first court in the Southern District of New York to consider whether service by Facebook is an acceptable means of alternative service. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
” *John Nieman suggests that the Court’s single-sentence denial of the states’ petitions may be the perfect book-end to its single-sentence denial of the first same-sex marriage claim in 1972: “With forty years of hindsight, the Court’s one-liner saying effectively nothing in Baker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm by JB
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 10:51 am by Joy Waltemath
The court first noted that the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes judicial review of final agency action. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Grandeau, No. 06-4895 "In a First Amendment case stemming from a state lobbying commission's inquiry into whether plaintiff-organization incurred reportable lobbying expenses in connection with a billboard promoting awareness of free speech issues in a private shopping mall, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) although the district court erred in finding that the case was moot because the organization's complaint challenged an… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The same problems exist but have not been acknowledged in state court under article 15 of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The same problems exist but have not been acknowledged in state court under article 15 of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
The district court dismissed the lawsuit on Section 230 grounds in a garbled and controversial opinion. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
Supreme Court, in Permanent Mission of India to the UN v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:49 am by Joy Waltemath
“No circuit court of appeals has addressed the question of whether BMS applies to FLSA collective actions, and the district courts nationwide are split,” the district court explained. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
When judicial officers seek to speak out publicly by participating in demonstrations, vigils, protests, or marches, two countervailing interests are at play: the First Amendment rights of the judge versus the state's interest in preserving the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary. [read post]