Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision yesterday (.pdf) in Stauffer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am
Thursday could mark a tipping point in the "automotive patent wars. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Sociologist and expert on the states Mark Regnerus tried to revive this theory in recent years, particularly in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
ThermoLife International LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
The Sixth Circuit further stated that the 2006 Act is designed to protect trademarks from any unfavorable sexual associations, and any new mark with a lewd or offensive-to-some sexual association raises a strong inference of tarnishment. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
in the case of Bywater v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
Yet, in the United States today, our criminal-justice system has it exactly backwards, relying on what Mark Kleiman and Kelsey Hollander justifiably call ”a system of randomly Draconian punishments. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm
There have been a few cases in California where litigants continue to hash out causes of action under state spam statutes (see Hypertouch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:45 am
This marks the first known criminal arrest of an abortion provider since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in 2022. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:26 pm
Couture v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:18 pm
: An Analysis of the Federal Circuit's Materiality Standard Under the Patent Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct Elizabeth Peters Felony Murder, the Merger Limitation, and Legislative Intent in State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Posner's use of the word "head" instead of "heads" in the following passage from that court's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Indeed, in 2008, the Supreme Court of California issued its seminal decision of Edwards v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:59 am
Mark Sherman reports for AP that the coalition of states “asked the Supreme Court for a fast-track review of a recent court ruling that declared part of the statute unconstitutional and cast a cloud over the rest. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:20 am
Every year, the first Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
