Search for: "State v. Roberts"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 16,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am
” At Take Care, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu argue that “both sides miss the central constitutional concern of the Establishment Clause,” which “separates the power of the state from that of communities of faith. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the case, along with a cert petition filed last week that involves a state-court subpoena for the president’s financial records, observing that “[e]ach case presents the Supreme Court with a separation-of-powers quandary—how to adjudicate a dispute between branches of the federal government in Trump v Mazars; and between the president and state prosecutors in Trump v Vance. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
Texas Medical Board, United States District Judge Robert L. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
Texas Medical Board, United States District Judge Robert L. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm
In the case of Rosemond v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Reacting to Chief Justice Roberts' statement that Vivek refers to, Professor Geoffrey Stone, a leading U.S. constitutional scholar has this to say (his full views on the Roberts speech are available here): "The Court has many responsibilities, and one of them is to produce majority opinions that state a rule of law. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
In a recent report from the Tax Policy Center, Richard Auxier analyzes state sports betting regulations after Murphy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Gosden v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 9:24 am
Robert Mayfield, a Texas-based fast-food purveyor, challenged the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
In a forceful dissent, Justice Scalia, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Souter and Thomas, argued that "Oregon’s sentencing scheme allows judges rather than juries to find the facts necessary to commit defendants to longer prison sentences, and thus directly contradicts what we held eight years ago and have reaffirmed several times since. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:13 am
” The lawsuit (The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
In Chowdury v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all lawyers who worked on the GOP side in Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In my FindLaw column appearing today, I discuss the recent Supreme Court decision in Herring v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
For example, as [Robert A.] [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The most significant tort case issued by the Roberts Court to date, Riegel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
