Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
United States v Chung. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Walling v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 2:41 pm
The plaintiffs in this case sought to certify a class of more than 250 purchasers of smartphones in the United States that contain Qualcomm chips, alleging that Qualcomm violated the Cartwright Act, California’s antitrust law. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
The reasoning of the Supreme Court's decision in United Savings Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
California before the Supreme Court in 1951, three years before Gus Garcia and Carlos Cadena made their historic argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in… [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Two particularly perfidious myths perpetrated by the asbestos litigation industry is that crocidolite was not used in the United States, and that chrysotile is as potent in causing mesothelioma as is crocidolite. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
Murray, University of California, Berkeley School of LawDoug NeJaime, University of California, Irvine School of LawNeil S. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
The case is Google v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that a trustee is not an agent. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Does 1-18, Inclusive, filed September 23 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:57 pm
Defendants’ next scheduled hearing will be before the Honorable Susan Illston, United States District Court Judge, on April 18, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. , announced United States Attorney Melinda Haag, Scott O’Briant, Special Agent in Charge, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Leslie DeMarco, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Inspector General, and Wade V. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
In Knick, the Court wiped out the “state-litigation requirement” of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Twenty-five of the forty-two states that have considered IIEI have adopted it, and the United States Supreme Court called IIEI a “widely recognized” tort. [read post]
