Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 7,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 12:11 pm
That math does not add up. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
(The opinion does not say what statutes the charges were brought under, but I assume the computer crime charge was brought under Kansas Statutes §21-3755(b)(1) and the theft charge was brought under Kansas Statutes §21-3701.) [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
I need a drink." [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:57 pm
App’x 631 (6th Cir. 2006) (Camiscione I), the court reversed a sentence of one day in the Marshal’s Lockup followed by three years supervised release. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
If the claimant wins, the damages or royalty will be X. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:42 pm
Hernandez' living quarters just went from a palatial, 10,000+ s.f. home in a desirable community, to an 8 x 10 jail cell, with a roommate. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
(Maybe it is the law dork equivalent of, Does this dress make me look fat?) [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:49 pm
X-rays pointed at my head? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
This does not seem to be the right thing. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:09 am
I say, when asked "And how does Mrs Secord qualify as 'women in the military'?" [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
This book is not meant to be the definitive guide to the legislative history of the NDAAs (though Lawfare covered virtually all of it), nor does it capture every single debate commentators had about the laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:21 pm
VA does not have a great track record in drafting timely regulations. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
Again, that the claims here are in category X or Y don't matter. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:47 pm
Not so long ago, I had the experience of having a lawyer put a chart together during his crossexamination of an expert witness. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Since Google Patents does not allow one to export information, I use Petapator, a Chrome extension, to capture the data for later use. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Since Google Patents does not allow one to export information, I use Petapator, a Chrome extension, to capture the data for later use. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
App’x 887, 891 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449) · Count X for Declaratory Judgment (Infringement of U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
