Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 4041 - 4060 of 6,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am by Moseley Collins
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Kevin Russell
Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001); see also Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am by Lyle Denniston
  In fact, there are only three: the Fourth Amendment violation at issue in Bivens itself, a sexual harassment claim against a member of Congress by one of his secretaries (Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Shafik Bhalloo
BCTV 1998 CanLII 6527 (BC CA), (1998), 59 B.C.L.R. (3d) 121 (C.A.), at para. 29 [7] Hollinsworth, supra., at para. 13, see also Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Shafik Bhalloo
BCTV 1998 CanLII 6527 (BC CA), (1998), 59 B.C.L.R. (3d) 121 (C.A.), at para. 29 [7] Hollinsworth, supra., at para. 13, see also Davis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:41 am by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the Northern District of California, Davis et al. v. [read post]