Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 4041 - 4060 of 61,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 7:39 am
Cross-posted at Opinio JurisIn something of a surprise move, the Supreme Court decided today to grant cert in Kiyemba v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Rodgers, 12-382 (state-on-top), Burt v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The grant of the petition notes that the case presents the following issues: (1) What procedural protections are required by Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by CMS
The Law 1984 Act: S. 13 states that leave cannot be granted unless there is “substantial ground” for awarding the application. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
Thanksgiving is always a good time for non-Natives to reflect on the colonial history of the United States and particularly the lands that have been granted by tribes in some cases and, in others, taken forcibly or through patently unfair negotiations. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:52 am
Marion County OFC (this was a 4/27/07 NFP involuntary termination, affirmed) State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm by Kristina Araya
Mungo in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 2:41 pm by Patricia Hughes
” (Ontario Government’s Factum, para. 29) The government stated further, Concern for the welfare of others or disdain for government action are not sufficient bases to grant a plaintiff standing. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr McGeough was not convicted of any offences in Germany, but was later extradited to the United States, where he pleaded guilty to moving weapons between states without a licence. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
In Useinov v Netherlands [2006] ECHR 1213 the asylum-seeking applicant was allowed to live in the Netherlands while his case was pending for more than five years and the ECtHR found that it was not possible to equate his situation with a lawful stay where the authorities grant an alien permission to settle in their country. [read post]