Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 29,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Pae v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
In Mendez v May, 2015 WL 143965 (D. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Almost a decade on, there are still very few cases that interpret those state-level changes as differing in any meaningful way from the federal standards. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
--Court: Court of Appeals of Colorado, Division OneOpinion Date: 6/11/09Cite: Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am
“The Limited Engagement Letter and Legal Malpractice” — “One hires an attorney to handle a case and expects that the attorney will handle the entire case at a level of good practice to which a competent attorney should adhere. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
It is in fact a mantra of EU law that one of the duties of the Community legislature itself is to ensure “a high level of health protection”; see the ruling by the ECJ and the Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed in case C-491/01 R v Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453 at paragraphs 119-121 and 229-230. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
In June the United States Supreme Court struck down the federal law commonly known as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:45 am
Bradley Hester originally brought the case Hester v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
State of Md., 935 F.Supp. 659, 664 (D.Md.1996). [read post]
