Search for: "People v. David" Results 4041 - 4060 of 6,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On 15 January 2020, Nicol J will heard the trial in the case of Dyson v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
The decision in Holder v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
Air quality and legitimate expectation: the full judgment in the Cornwall Waste Forum case October 28, 2011 David Hart QC Is the Attorney General right on prisoner votes and subsidiarity? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:34 pm by Eric Turkewitz
The State of New York (David Waterbury is plaintiff’s counsel, who I know for about 20 years; Schuler-CourtOfClaims-S&C 2. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Jean Schmidt, one of the bill’s sponsors, put it, “We recognize that people that are of color, people that have less means, tend to end up on death row more so than people with means or higher education. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The state of Victoria is leading the push to extend the existing defamation defence of absolute privilege to people who make complaints to police and bodies such as anti-discrimination commissions and professional disciplinary bodies. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
And yet people without counsel should be able to access out-of-court dispute resolution processes just as they access in-court processes. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
As many readers may know, Ehrlich's work in the 1970s was cited in Gregg v. [read post]