Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 4041 - 4060
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2018, 8:36 am
By Robert Margolis, J.D. and Lisa Milam, J.D. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:08 pm
Supreme Court of Florida: US v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Supreme Court in Nestlé v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
The defendants affected by the Court’s ruling on the statute of limitation filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court and on June 27, 2011, the Court granted the petition. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
If the high court takes this case, an interesting question is posed: Can participating in a fantasy baseball league require Unites States Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:01 am
The issue has unfortunately not been resolved by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:20 am
Robins and Campbell Ewald Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
In 1971, in a case called Bivens v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday of this week in Schuette v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Once again, preferences and politics, not law, were the coins of the realm at the United States Supreme Court.Despite the conservative justices' rhetorical embrace of public meaning originalism, the reality is that constitutional litigation almost always involves the balancing of important and conflicting values. 303 Creative v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:45 pm
In that case, federal district court judge Robert Gettleman noted his awareness of Sunbelt and its rejection of the legitimate business interest test, but he applied the test anyway, noting that “[t]he Illinois Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and this court, however, have not rejected the applications of the legitimate business interest test. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In that decision (which we discussed in an earlier blog post), federal district court judge Robert Gettleman declined to follow Sunbelt, noting that “[t]he Illinois Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and this court, however, have not rejected the applications of the legitimate business interest test. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am
Robert R. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 am
State Farm v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:17 am
Securities and Exchange Commission that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
