Search for: "Robert Rule" Results 4041 - 4060 of 29,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Sebelius (NFIB), 567 U.S. 519, 530–38 (2012) written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not rely upon the Commerce Clause for Constitutional authority to enact the ACA. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:01 am by Rick Hasen
The ruling radically and illicitly trumps democratic processes to favor the political interests of the already economically privileged. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Contrary to the prevailing wisdom, however, Brian Fitzpatrick argues in chapter five that these decisions have not radically and unduly altered the rules of civil litigation through judicial fiat so much as they have updated federal pleading rules to account for technological and other changes that increase the costs of litigation. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am by Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman
” Therefore, he may not be an “officer of the United States” under the rule in Lucia. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:33 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Supreme Court: Warrants needed in GPS tracking. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "Texas redistricting discriminates against minorities, federal court says. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:42 am
Today in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that "City Can Reject Religious Display; Supreme Court Backs Utah Officials. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm by Chuck Peterson
He writes today's post:            The Supreme Court unanimously ruled yesterday that the police must acquire a warrant before searching a cell phone seized from someone they arrest. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s ruling in Qassim v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Oddly, the NFL is now seeking expedited relief from the Fifth Circuit without first waiting for the Court to rule on the identical issue. [read post]