Search for: "State v. Code" Results 4041 - 4060 of 27,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2021, 9:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
Despite almost half the states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court overturned the federal ban in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm by Apsosredesign
  1532: During the reign of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, law passed stating the opinion of medical men must be formally given in the cases of violent death. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm by Alfred Fraijo Jr. and Reuben Duarte*
  Some of the concerns raised were that, in theory, such an ordinance could conflict with the state Building Code and increase construction costs by limiting the use of Type V construction. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Congress has explicitly stated the Internal Revenue Code “shall be applied to any taxpayer with due regard to any treaty obligation of the United States which applies to such taxpayer. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hamilton Health Sciences, 2021 HRTO 213 (CanLII) [113] This Tribunal stated in Moore v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its long-awaited ruling in the case of Google v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:45 am by Editor Charlie
Oracle case, in which the Court ruled 6–2 that Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java code was permissible under the fair use doctrine, Copyright Alliance CEO Keith Kupferschmid stated the following:  “Yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling in favor of Google in the decade long Google v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:13 am by SHG
And, under Title VII itself, they say sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes will prove unsustainable after our decision today. [read post]
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) when the state is acting on its own behalf and exercising its discretion in deciding to pursue licensing for a hydroelectric dam project? [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
The Secretary of State for Justice during the Second Reading of the Bill described concerns about “annoyance” as a “canard” (see further below). [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 8:59 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Murphy v City of Galveston, TX, 2021 WL 1220204 (SD TX 3/31/2021) [read post]