Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/21/07 referred to codes LAW / CRIM-PROCA5630 Walker (MS) -- Permits denial of bail or release in certain cases involving dangerous crimes or to protect jurors, witnesses or evidence; repealer SUMM : Rpld & add S530.10 & S530.30 sub 1, amd CP L, generally Permits a judicial officer on application of a prosecuting attorney to deny bail or pretrial release to certain persons accused of dangerous crimes or to release such persons on condition in certain… [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am by Kurt R. Karst
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
Circuit Court of Appeals, Published Opinion, April 2, 2010 The published opinion. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
If I am wrong, I will readily note the correction and eat my words, but I am sure they will be quite digestible.[6] 1915-01-15. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
    Therefore, subject to a final court decision (and appeals as may occur), Zwerner is facing the maximum FBAR penalties under the law. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
  The shareholder appealed the grant of the no-action letter to the SEC. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Another serious blawger, Nearly Legal, a specialist in housing matters, was able to take time away from such matters to report in his own Blawg Review 115 on the extraordinary episode of the flashing Court of Appeal judge and the evidence given about his choice of underwear. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
There is a requirement of a “conviction” under most mandatory exclusion provisions.[12] In fact, it has been held that a deferred prosecution agreement in a local State court for misdemeanor theft was a sufficient basis for the imposition of a mandatory exclusion.[13] It should also be noted that State agencies are required to notify the OIG of any criminal convictions in State or local courts if they involve an entity that receives Medicaid… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The filing date of the impugned patent was February 1, 2000.Background[4.1] The Opposition Division (OD), in the decision under appeal, held that, out of the documents that the opponent had submitted, i.e. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
If I am wrong, I will readily note the correction and eat my words, but I am sure they will be quite digestible.5 Jan. 15, 1915. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determinó en Employment Division v. [read post]