Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
In an interesting opinion that includes among other things a noteworthy discussion of issues arising under the Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
It may have amused certain of his cronies to see good ol' boy Ezra Levant ambush, bully and harangue the very unfortunate woman assigned by the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission to investigate the complaints advanced against him. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a directions hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Nicklin J. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
 On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Taylor v Crouch and another before Nicklin J. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 14 March 2024 there was a contempt application in the case of Taylor v Chief Constable of Kent, QB-2022-000310. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
Tenn. 1963) (Taylor, C.J.) [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of Daryanani v Ramnani ([2017] EWHC 183 (QB)). [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance PI comments on Taylor Swift’s alleged use of facial recognition software at a kiosk in a recent concert, which scanned users face’s without consent and compared them to those documented to pose a security risk to her. [read post]