Search for: "True v True" Results 4041 - 4060 of 33,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Mere speculation and bare legal conclusions without any factual support set out in an Article 78 petition are ineffective in rebutting a defendant's motion to dismissEngland v New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly found that the Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded causes of action alleging negligence, gross negligence, and negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and direction, citing Moskowitz v Masliansky, 198 AD3d 637 and other decisions. * The Appellate Division noted "[c]auses of action alleging negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision are not statutorily required to be pleaded with specificity". [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
”Given the foregoing, the AD2 reversed the underlying order and reinstated the case against the County.Looks like a totally different outcome was fostered there.# # #G. v Orange County [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
”In the absence of any prejudice, and because the defendants couldn't identify any reason why Jane's true identity needed to be publicly disclosed, the underlying determination was left undisturbed.In other words, there will be no name-dropping here ….# # #DECISIONRoe v Harborfields Cent. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:17 am by Mark Summerfield
  This is not actually generally true, and good and bad law emerges from a wide variety of different cases. [read post]