Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 4061 - 4080 of 11,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Among its provisions, Texas Senate Bill 4 would authorize police officers to question people they arrest or detail about their immigration status, and impose fines on local officials who resist cooperating with federal agencies in deporting illegal immigrants. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm by Sergio F. Oehninger
App. filed Aug. 22, 2017); Cooper Gay Martinez Del Rio y Asociados Intermediarios de Reaseguro S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm by Brittany M. Davidson
App. filed Aug. 22, 2017); Cooper Gay Martinez Del Rio y Asociados Intermediarios de Reaseguro S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 10:49 am by Scott Bomboy
This is consistent with long-established cooperative principles among law enforcement agencies,” Sessions said. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction2017 NY Slip Op 02192, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentIn 2003 the petitioner-plaintiff [Petitioner] was notified by her employer,  Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus Board of Cooperative Educational Services [BOCES], that her position as a tenured teacher of gifted and talented elementary school students had been abolished. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05760 (2d Dept., 2017) the parties stipulation provided that the defendant was entitled to 50% of the marital portion of the plaintiff’s pension and  that the parties were to cooperate with each other in obtaining a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to divide the pension, that they would equally share the cost of preparing the QDRO, and that the defendant’s share would be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 05760 (2d Dept., 2017) the parties stipulation provided that the defendant was entitled to 50% of the marital portion of the plaintiff’s pension and  that the parties were to cooperate with each other in obtaining a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to divide the pension, that they would equally share the cost of preparing the QDRO, and that the defendant’s share would be determined pursuant to the formula set forth in Majauskas v. [read post]