Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4061 - 4080 of 12,892
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 3:16 am by David Lynn
In order to eliminate this distinction, Nasdaq proposes to amend Rules 5605(c)(2)(B), 5605(d)(3) and 5605(e)(3) to allow a director who is a family member of a non-executive employee of a listed company to serve on the listed company's audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee under exceptional and limited circumstances. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:30 pm by Frank Pasquale
Economists and B-school professors appear content to churn out papers and reports without revealing the full web of financial ties affecting their thinking. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:50 am
An act cannot be deceptive within the meaning of § 10(b) where the actor has no duty to disclose. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by Stephen Lubben
§1106(c) gives the FDIC the right to file an involuntary bankruptcy petition against a company that has defaulted on a loan guarantee received from the FDIC during a "liquidity event," as defined in §1105(g). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:46 am by Jay Fishman
Gen Laws §§ 7-11-101 et seq.Under the regulatory framework established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act” or “Act”), advisers to certain private funds who previously relied on an exemption from SEC registration pursuant to Section 203(b)(3) of the Investment Advisers Act will now be subject to registration while others, including advisers to venture capital funds, will be exempt from registration but required… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 10:27 pm by Jeff Rogyom
  Each referencing a paragraph of the Internal Revenue Code, the relevant reorganization formats are known as Type A, Type B, and Type C reorganizations. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:14 pm by Stewart Baker
And it’s working pretty much exactly the way you’d expect. c. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Doug Cornelius
As we stated in the Proposing Release and reaffirm here, the effect of Section 201(b) is to permit private funds to engage in general solicitation in compliance with new Rule 506(c) without losing either of the exclusions under the Investment Company Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 6:04 pm by Brad Sandler
  Section 503(c)(1) prohibits the payment to an retention payment to an insider unless a debtor proves that (A) the individual has a bona fide job offer from another business at the same or greater compensation; (B) the services of the individual are essential to the survival of the debtor’s business; and (C) either (i) the payment is not greater than 10 times the amount of the mean payment to nonmanagement; or (ii) if no payments made to nonmanagement… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Doug Cornelius
As we stated in the Proposing Release and reaffirm here, the effect of Section 201(b) is to permit private funds to engage in general solicitation in compliance with new Rule 506(c) without losing either of the exclusions under the Investment Company Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Ailyn Cabico
  These proposed changes would significantly affect fund managers who offer or sell their funds that are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act through third party marketers, nearly all of which are required to be registered as broker-dealers. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  B/c it’s changing all the time, getting a sense of changes is very important. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
Effient products contain prasugrel hydrochloride, which is also known as 5-[(1RS)-2-cyclopropyl-1-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridin-2-yl acetate hydrochloride or 2-acetoxy-5-(alpha-cyclopropylcarbonyl-2-fluorobenzy1)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrothieno[3,2-c]pyridine hydrochloride, and is covered by the '726 patent. [read post]