Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 7,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2013, 8:30 pm
Joint App’x 325. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:30 pm
Here is an example of the various "versions" available for an article I wrote back in 2000 that was published in Libri Journal. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:08 am
App’x 559, 563 (2d Cir. 2006). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
So I think we now have a more accurate picture. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
So if I apply to register BRAND X in connection with shoes, and you apply to register BRAND X in connection with socks, the PTO might properly issue a suspension letter to you. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am
So what does this have to do with taxes? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm
A combination of gamification (not a great word) and machine learning might allow a system to press a student to express more than “I memorized X” and move to explaining why in a discussion. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:38 am
Client: I’m thinking of X% as a royalty. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:30 pm
Rocha does fall under any of the exclusions permitting unpaid labour enumerated under the ss. 1(2) or 3(5) of ESA or s. 2(1) of O. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:56 pm
The pediatrician took X-rays and believed that the girl might have a broken her right hip. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:10 am
Finally, at the Yale Law School conference I attended, Dr. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 6:14 am
I would highly recommend Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:32 am
From the point of view of economics, "harm X" simply means "lower X's utility." [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:52 am
But what exactly does that mean and what are the components that make up a trusting relationship between lawyer and client? [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:22 am
It's possible that the problem under the X-tax is worse in the absence of an averaging mechanism (if wages vary more on an annual basis than does consumption), yet it also might in practice be easier to solve. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:35 pm
In other words, Marcy has wowed herself with the difference between a fax that says “The law means X” and a memo that says “The law means X. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:59 pm
That I could understand.But Judge Kleinfeld does something different. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:43 am
I hope to hear from you. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 6:16 am
("In the last several chapter 11 cases, our fees and expenses ranged from $x to $x+n.")So perhaps flat fees might not work, but rough (and I mean "rough") budgets might act as a cap on a firm's choices for how to handle a matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
Laura added: "HB1/HB217 does not address the needs of patients with chronic pain. [read post]
