Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 4061 - 4080 of 29,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm by admin
, 289 F. 2d 1230, 1239 (2003) (citing Daubert II for the proposition that peer review shows the research meets the minimal criteria for good science). [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
The defendant spent time and money defending against those mistakes, and the plaintiffs have no responsibility? [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am by Schachtman
, 289 F. 2d 1230, 1239 (2003) (citing Daubert II for the proposition that peer review shows the research meets the minimal criteria for good science). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Arbitration waiver is usually asserted against defendants who try out federal court before seeking to arbitrate. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am by Andrew Hamm
” In 2019, the Department of Health and Human Services issued its rule on the ground that “[i]f a Title X project refers for … abortion as a method of family planning, it is a program ‘where abortion is a method of family planning. [read post]
In a motion for rehearing, Lynch’s public defender wrote, “[i]f any of the photographs of the other potential matches from the facial recognition program resembles the drug seller or Appellant then clearly there was a Brady/discovery violation and Appellant should be granted a new trial. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:36 am by Jonathan F. Marshall
If you are charged with trafficking narcotics or another drug offense, the skillful New Jersey drug distribution defense attorneys and drug possession lawyers of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The underlying complaint further alleged that “[f]resh wooden sticks, like ‘popsicle sticks,’ were used … to apply the wax, but the same sticks were dipped into the same wax used by all patrons, thereby negligently becoming contaminated for further use by humans. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The officers arrived on the scene and asked defendant "what was going on," to which he replied, "you tell me what the f***'s going on. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Daniel Jin
The fine was levied under both Article 5(1)(f) (which has a cap of 4% of worldwide turnover) and Article 32 (which has a 2% cap), but as the fine in actuality represents less than 1% of Marriott’s turnover this distinction (i.e. that between the amounts able to be fined for breaches of the two articles in play) was not regarded as a significant factor (in itself this distinction in the caps is interesting given the obligations under both Articles are very similar – both require… [read post]