Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 9,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 11:58 am
” The SBA itself “does not have discretion when it comes to designating HUBZones. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 12:29 am
In particular, three main questions come to my mind once again.1) A deprivation of rights? [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 1:16 pm
However, she is believed to have been traveling 60 mph in a 35-mph zone. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 1:16 pm
However, she is believed to have been traveling 60 mph in a 35-mph zone. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm
What does the respondent think "routine drug crimes" refers to? [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:26 am
Following UPS' application both the initial examiner and the Board of Appeal rejected the mark, refusing it under both Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
The opinions are admissible only for the fact that they were made at the time. [16] Without having met the requirements of Rule 40A, the oral testimony of the doctor interpreting his clinical records does not change the nature of the evidence contained in those clinical records. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:43 pm
TQP, 2014 WL651935, at *1. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Jay's Stores, Inc., 361 Mass. 35, 36 (1972). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:39 am
Morning Session 2: The Current State of the Law Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Upcoming Supreme Court Oral Argument: SCA Hygiene (laches) on November 1; Star Athletica (copyright of cheerleader outfit) on October 31. 1. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:29 am
N.1. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
" Judge Mayer's concurring opinion, while not precedent setting, does provide insight into the thought process and opinion of software patent held by at least one judge on the Federal Circuit. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:02 am
” 35 U.S.C. 100(b). [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:23 pm
Ejectment Actions Ejectment is a legal action brought by a plaintiff under N.J.S.A. 2A:35-1 and R. 4:59-2, claiming a right to possess real property against a defendant who currently possesses the property. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:57 am
(1) A "codification" of existing CJEU case law: a good attempt? [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 10:28 am
Option 1 means “no change” – the case would stay put. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Lee 15-955Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
”[1] In XXI Oil & Gas v. [read post]
