Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 19,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
In general, section 2(a) will be infringed by non-trivial state (or state-sponsored) interference with an Aboriginal sacred site. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, (MI Ct. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Were Margerum properly before the court, Plaintiffs' reliance on Margerum for the proposition that no notice of claim is required where the complaint alleges violations of the State and City Human Rights Laws is misplaced "where a notice of claim is required pursuant to Education Law §3813(1)"; and 3. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:51 am
The State Executive Law spells this out. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 11:51 am
* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Yamassee Indian Tribe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This ethic has profound consequences not only for abortion, but for many other areas of life, including the death penalty, the application of scientific research to human subjects, the right to adequate health care, and the role of the state in promoting the common good. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
In Hordyk v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
The Notice of Appeal (full text) in Sexual Minorities Uganda v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
In Matter of Ferrelli v State of New York, (App. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:52 pm
Here, in Stoetzl v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Were Margerum properly before the court, Plaintiffs' reliance on Margerum for the proposition that no notice of claim is required where the complaint alleges violations of the State and City Human Rights Laws is misplaced "where a notice of claim is required pursuant to Education Law §3813(1)"; and 3. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
Under human rights law, the UK is obliged to protect individuals from the acts of third party states. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
The State of New Jersey, 174 NJ 412 (2002). [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
--Judicial SUPREMACY: One has to obey Supreme Court Precedent (inferior courts certainly burt maybe also everyone else (Cooper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
” This conflict was resolved in her favor in 2019 in a separate case heard before the ECHR and also titled Khadija Ismayilova v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 2:48 pm
In Naurto v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
Therefore, there is a moral mandate that no one shall be deprived of life by the State as it savages humanity and sanctifies barbarity. [read post]
