Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 4061 - 4080 of 88,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
The California Supreme Court decided in PRACHASAISORADEJ v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
In late May, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin and Montana State Auditor Monica Lindeen had each filed petitions with the court requesting judicial review of the legality of the Commission’s expansion of the exemptions available under Regulation A. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Exception #1: Law Enforcement It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state temporarily… [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm by M@jux-@dmin
EXCEPTION #1: LAW ENFORCEMENT It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state temporarily… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am by Randolph Rice
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Under s.6(1), a “religious group” operates without State registration and acquisition of legal personality and may include Russian nationals and lawfully resident non-nationals as participants [14&15]. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Observing that “[m]edical certification” of disability had “become one of the major paths to public aid in the modern welfare state,” Stone wondered whether policymakers were asking the “concept of disability” to do too much and whether they were sufficiently alert to the concept’s tendency to expand over time.Filed in 1983 and decided by the Supreme Court in 1990, Sullivan v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In this instance, said the Appellate Division, the relevant collective bargaining agreement expressly created a prior legal obligation on the part of the Town to pay the subject legal fees incurred by the individual.*** Public Officers Law §17, provides for the defense and indemnification of officers and employees of the State as the employer by the State. .** See Civil Service Law Section 204-a.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:28 pm
On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, issued a substantial class certification opinion in Cartwright, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Before the action could proceed to trial, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by FM Librarian
Sessions Bodes Well for Overturning Matter of A-B- (ImmigrationProf Blog, July 2018) [text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (24 July 2018)- News: New Legal Decision on Domestic Violence (15 June 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Holtzman v Griffith  2018 NY Slip Op 04540  Decided on June 20, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department, aside from its lesson on “account stated” tells us that a legal malpractice claim from a settled divorce action has many hurdles to jump. [read post]