Search for: "Samsung" Results 4061 - 4080 of 6,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung could also prevail on some of its Rule 50 (overrule-the-jury) requests and have one or more liability findings overturned. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am by Gene Quinn
The denial of the injunction will allow Samsung to continue to sell phones found to infringe Apple's patents. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
In the Apple-Samsung context I wrote in a standard-essential Samsung v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:50 am by Chris Foresman
Apple and Samsung have been locked in an ongoing, global legal dispute over smartphone patents since April 2011. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
If Judge Grewal agred that there is no good cause for a belated infringement accusation, he could deny that part of Samsung's motion even if Samsung didn't oppose Apple's amendments (in which case Apple wouldn't formally oppose Samsung's). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
It's no surprise that Samsung immediately filed court papers this afternoon to notify Koh (and the public) of the early results. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:07 am by Joe Mullin
According to the LA Times, bankruptcy filings show that the twelve buying companies are: Google, Apple, Facebook, Research in Motion, Amazon, Microsoft, Samsung, Adobe, Huawei Technologies, HTC, Fujifilm, and Shutterfly. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:26 am by Florian Mueller
I wanted to take the time (despite all the Apple-Samsung action yesterday) to identify the most interesting parts of those filings. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:11 am by Florian Mueller
On Monday, Judge Koh denied Apple a permanent injunction against Samsung over the patents the jury had found infringed, but that does not mean that Samsung is free to infringe. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:02 pm by Gene Quinn
Related posts:Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War ContinuesWhy is this fight so important? [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The topic of "unexpected results" arose in Samsung SDI Co. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:07 am by Chris Foresman
Apple has gone after Samsung for what it calls "blatant copying" of its mobile devices, like the iPhone and iPad. [read post]
16 Dec 2012, 10:02 pm by Sean Hayes
__________Sean Hayes, IPG’s Co-Chair of the Korea Practice Team, may be contacted at: SeanHayes@ipglegal.comSimilar Posts: 12 New Items Prohibited from Export from Korea by Overflow of Core National Technology Law of Korea The New Korean In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Act 2020 Samsung Faces Challenges as It Tries to Win Smartphone Wars Export of Korean Nuclear Technology Abroad: Netherlands Inks Deal with Korea for a Reactor Upgrade Exit Ban of Foreigners in Korea for Not Paying… [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 11:26 am by David Kemp
On November 30, Washington Research Foundation filed a patent infringement lawsuit against ten defendants, including Apple, Microsoft, Samsung, and HP. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 10:28 pm by Florian Mueller
As current examples of allegedly-infringing products, the complaint mentions, among dozens of products, the Samsung Galaxy S III (and its predecessor, the S&nbp;II), the Samsung Galaxy Nexus (GT-I9020A), the Samsung Infuse 4G, the Samsung Captivate Glide, and the Samsung Galaxy Note as well as its successor, the Note II. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple also argued that Samsung is the party taking the initiative to discuss this agreement, so Samsung should explain why it believes it's relevant, and Apple would respond. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Samsung case has ordered that Apple's license with HTC be produced to Samsung in connection with the discovery for the upcoming permanent injunction hearing. [read post]