Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 4061 - 4080 of 4,524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:24 pm
  The case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Ninth Circuit’s unpublished April 17, 2018 opinion in Aqua Star (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (g) For purposes of this section, "notice" may be provided by one of the following methods:    (1) Written notice. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Munro.Abingdon, Oxon, UK ; New York : Routledge, 2010.Constitutional LawK3161 .F73 2010Framing the state in times of transition : case studies in constitution making / Laurel E. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:46 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On November 4, 2013, the OFCCP announced a conciliation agreement that settled pay and hiring discrimination claims against G&K Services Co., a federal contractor providing uniform rental services to a number of different government agencies. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am by Fiona de Londras
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
 The decision stated:  “The further test to be applied is whether the skilled person would, using common knowledge, regard the remaining claimed subject-matter as explicitly or implicitly, but directly and unambiguously, disclosed in the application as filed (see point 4.5.4 on page 39 of decision G 2/10). [read post]