Search for: "47 DEFENDANTS" Results 4081 - 4100 of 4,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am by Schachtman
  At his deposition, and in opposition to defendants’ 702 motion, Omalu became more forthcoming with actual data and argument. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
In response to the very first question (from Justice Kennedy) Wyeth's counsel stated the defendant's broad preemption position, "could they use. . .the precise label that in approving the application in 1998 the FDA required Wyeth to use, and also use the label that the Vermont jury determined should be used[?] [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm by carie
Defendants have poor access to executive clemency and too often the States fails to recognise the defendant's capacity for change, rehabilitation and remorse. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
”  The court disagrees: Other courts defining participation under § 1595 have, “in the absence of direct association,” required “a showing of a continuous business relationship between the trafficker and the [defendant] such that it would appear that the trafficker and the [defendant] have established a pattern of conduct or could be said to have a tacit agreement. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, the applicable standard is whether the defendant facilitated/induced *illegal* content. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13]  The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14]  An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13]  The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14]  An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:35 am
" Michaels was sentenced to 47 years in the "sex case. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:20 am by velvel
The Trustee’s Complaint Against JP Morgan Chase.February 9, 2011 A few days ago, when I was just beginning to read the Trustee’s complaint against JP Morgan Chase, I posted the fairly dramatic introduction to the complaint. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 14-07-47, 2008-Ohio-1484 (separation of powers, retroactivity, double jeopardy, ex post facto) State v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:17 am by Rob Robinson
In discussing the “knowing” requirement of the act,[26] it notes that Congress intended to address the problem of “head-in-the-sand” defendants.[27] Remaining ignorant of bribery while subtly sanctioning it, then, is not an effective strategy to avoid meeting the FCPA’s knowledge requirement. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
Wilkins, 47 S.W.3d 486, 505 (Tex. 2001); Capital Metro. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Woo, Fenwick & West, Palo Alto, California, for defendant-appellant. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
& Institutional Rights,Inc., 547 U.S. 47, 62 (2006). [read post]