Search for: "Long v State"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 45,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
Yesterday marked the 37th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:12 am
 Specifically, via US v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
The carport at issue is one that's familiar to anyone who's lived in cheaper apartments in our Great State: the carports consist of a line of open-ended stalls on the first floor of the apartment complex easily accessible to the street. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:19 am
For instance, a group of South African Copyright Academics issued a Joint Academic Opinion stating that there was no constitutional need/requirement to re-tag the Bills. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:33 am
Today’s Long Island employment law blog discusses the decision in Rasmy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:52 am
On the upside, the NY bar exam is only two days long. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am
Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
In New York v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:17 am
The case of Ricky Lee Allshouse v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the difficulty of casting one's mind back to the state of technology at the time the invention was made, courts have long recognized the usefulness of evidence of the contemporaneous attitude toward the asserted invention. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Arlington v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm
Continue reading → The post Important Texas Oil & Gas Case – Roland Oil Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
United States (D. [read post]
23 May 2009, 8:54 am
This should cause us all to pause and, as Justice Stevens recently urged in Baze v. [read post]
