Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 45,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 6:07 pm
Third, the Supreme Court long ago held that the Fed. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Dred Scott, which was appeared in the Yale Law Journal 106 (1997): 1033:This article argues that Harriet Robinson Scott's significance as co-plaintiff in Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:59 am
The Second Circuit has certified a question to the New York State Court of Appeals relating to long-arm jurisdiction under New York law. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The resulting lawsuit, Baumann v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The resulting lawsuit, Baumann v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 5:49 am
Regional bodies, such as the African Union and the Arab League, have long expressed apprehension over what they perceive as the uneven application of international criminal law—particularly when prosecutions appear to disproportionately target leaders from the so-called “Global South”. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
The multi-million dollar legal and forensic accounting fees incurred by companies investigating fraud perpetrated by their executives may be included in a restitution order under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
In New York v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:50 pm
Sun Sun Lin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am
Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:00 am
In Tash v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 8:54 am
This should cause us all to pause and, as Justice Stevens recently urged in Baze v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:33 am
Today’s Long Island employment law blog discusses the decision in Rasmy v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Arlington v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:55 am
Cir. 1985) (“Recognizing the difficulty of casting one's mind back to the state of technology at the time the invention was made, courts have long recognized the usefulness of evidence of the contemporaneous attitude toward the asserted invention. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
United States (D. [read post]
