Search for: "MATTER OF M J S" Results 4081 - 4100 of 4,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 9:02 am by Steve Hall
” He explained Friday why he did not follow the approach of Justices William J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
I was reminded of that game when reading the five cases wrapped up in Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, which J termed "the Famous Five". [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
I was reminded of that game when reading the five cases wrapped up in Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, which J termed "the Famous Five". [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Assuming that it is possible for a filter to constructively identify whether or not a downloader (or uploader, for that matter) had the right to do so (it's not), and ignoring the privacy violations involved in examining Internet users' communications, the filters themselves are too imperfect to be useful, as Venkat Balasubramani reminds us at SpamNotes. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:06 am by Douglas Keene
It’s akin to when the West Wing was on television and news shows would ask Martin (“I’m not the President but I play one on TV”) Sheen to weigh in on political matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:13 pm by Adam Thierer
  And here’s a podcast Berin Szoka and I did providing an overview of the series. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 7:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
President: Abe Never Said It , JOHN J. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by PJ Blount
(j) The amendments made by this section shall take effect on April 1, 2010. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
The latest is Jørgen S Nielsen and Lisbet Christoffersen (eds), Shari‘a as discourse: legal traditions and the encounter with Europe (2010). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
The latest is Jørgen S Nielsen and Lisbet Christoffersen (eds), Shari‘a as discourse: legal traditions and the encounter with Europe (2010). [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 7:31 am by Durga Rao
“An Act to provide for the establishment of a Board to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto”. [read post]