Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 4081 - 4100
of 10,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Coverage A – Dwelling And Coverage B – Other Structures 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
However, in this case, state self-restraint does not amount to absolute state abstention. [read post]
Scott Rothstein Arrested, Trial Set For 1/11/2010 And Filings In USA v. Rothstein, 0:09-cr-60331-JIC
1 Dec 2009, 6:53 pm
Mass Mutual v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The case is David Couture v Playdom (Fed. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
” Argentine Republic v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am
A court’s review of a PERB's decision is limited to determining if it was affected by an error of law or it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretionKent v Lefkowitz, 2016 NY Slip Op 03650, Court of Appeals In response to New York State Racing and Wagering Board* (the Racing Board) reducing per diem wages for its seasonal employees* by 25%, the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO [PEF], the certified collective bargaining representative for the… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 2:00 am
This case came a few years before the electronic discovery juggernaut, Zubulake v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Cette distinction entre devoirs et pouvoirs a été consacrée en 1963 au Royaume-Uni dans l’arrêt de principe R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
12 C.F.R. 205.10(b). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:09 am
12 C.F.R. 205.10(b). [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am
The relevant provision of the New York Convention – article V(1)(a) – can be found in section 103(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act, and states that “the recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused if the person against whom it is invoked proves (…) that the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which the parties subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am
Representing Dimaya, E. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
§2031.240(b) does specifically not state the kind of identification that is required, it is expected that for each document withheld that the privilege log state (a) the nature of the document (e.g., letter, memorandum, (b) date, (c) author, (d) recipients, (e) the sequential number (or document control umber, if any), and (f) the privilege claimed. [read post]
