Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 4081 - 4100 of 8,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm by Alan J. Borsuk
United States and the Birth of Federal Civil Rights Enforcement,” an essay version of Marquette Law School’s 2014 E. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
” If the company failed to comply and the union lost the election and objected to its noncompliance, a second election would be held; if the union won the runoff, the employer could then seek review of the rule’s validity under NLRA Section 10(e) or (f). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
SSL §111-v(4) and 18 NYCRR §347.10 (a)(1) and (f) provide for criminal sanctions for disclosure. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004]) and the… [read post]