Search for: "Study v. State" Results 4081 - 4100 of 15,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2017, 5:56 am by Tod M. Leaven
App. 472 (2014); see https://law.yale.edu/studying-law-yale/clinical-and-experiential-learning/our-clinics/veterans-legal-services-clinic/cardona-v-shinseki. [4] Burden v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:38 pm
The Supreme Court also held that phasing of archeological studies is not allowed under HRS chapter 6E. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  In a study of household exposure cases, in which the exposure resulted from a family member’s bringing home dust from work, IPF may be a much likelier alternative, and the failure to rule it out may invalidate conclusions about the asbestosis diagnosis in every case in the cohort. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
I did not want to prepare a serious caucus versus primary study and then contaminate it with biased data. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Nearly thirty years ago Justice Scalia’s Tanner lectures identified Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:11 am
It would be nice to such a thing in Indiana (or the United States).I took the time to skim (sorry but moving stuff out of the house and to new apartment left me way too tired to study) Watt v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Crusto (Loyola University New Orleans College of Law) has posted Blackness as State Property: Valuing Critical Race Theory (57 Harv. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:02 pm by Alison Siegler
In 1987, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of jailing federal defendants before trial in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  Although the vast majority of states require some form of notification of security breaches, formal notification requirements are rare outside the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm by George Lenard
There’s no way I can get the “scoop” on what has been perhaps the most eagerly awaited Supreme Court decision of the term: Ricci v. [read post]