Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 6,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2006, 8:58 pm
The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals reverses in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court Asked to Hear Proposition 8 Case Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: We are ready to defend our victories before the Supreme Court Washington, DC – Today, the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 asked the United States Supreme Court to review the landmark federal appeals court ruling in Perry v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:41 pm
Enter David Ten Eyck. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
(Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
” For Roberts, because Babcock “is not acting as a member of the National Guard of the United States all the time,” his salary as a dual technician is not a payment “wholly” for work “as” a member of that service. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
Prior to this Petitioner served in the United Stated Marine Corps for twenty years and retired as a Warrant Officer. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Along with David H. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
The United Kingdom Immigration Law Blog offers a roundup of legal immigration news: Points-based system, switching, etcetera. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
United States President Trump has successfully resisted an appeal against the dismissal of a libel claim by political strategist, Cheryl Jacobus. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 30089/04 [2011] ECHR 1121 (19 July 2011) ? [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:44 am
These were apparently lump sum licenses, but included “whereas” clauses stating that EcoFactor believed that the lump-sum payments were based upon this $X per-unit royalty rate. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
A case kicking around back them was United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
David L. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
United States, which he characterizes as having “effectively legalized racial profiling of drivers by police. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
