Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 9,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Mark A. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:53 am
First this: On Tuesday, in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
United States applies retroactively, noting that the Court “may well be on the verge of doing something it hasn’t done in decades (and of settling a messy, messy circuit split in the process). [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:22 am
See also Hildebrand v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf wonders why the dissenters to the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
CVSG: Now, the Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 10:49 am
The case marks the first time the Department of Justice (DOJ) has prosecuted any individuals under the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Ordinance since its enactment in 2002. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:51 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:22 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the defendants' motion to dismiss in Cornwell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:56 am
From the Complaint:“The expiration of a United States patent is not readily ascertainable by members of the American Public at the time of the product purchase. [read post]
